Some Reasons to believe

By 0

As soon as a murder is perpetrated, the investigators follow the clues in order to establish the identity of the actual murderer or murderers of such a horrible crime. However, during the enquiry, human intellect demands that the clues be not blindly followed as the hypothesis of ‘foul play’ remains a very subtle reality. It may be that the murderer himself, after having murdered his victim, comes out in the open to give the alarm. He could be the husband of the victim who, after committing the crime, finds the time to alert the police, whereas he is himself the culprit. For that reason, the police should not exclude any trial or probability, since the crime perpetrator may have many a trick up his sleeve. This same logic should apply in respect of terrorists attacks perpetuated everywhere in the world. Who are the brains behind these criminal acts? While keeping one’s feet firmly planted on the ground, there is always the probability of a ‘foul play’. It could be a stratagem of the local authorities to endanger the lives of innocent people to create tensions among them and afterward blame others for it. Could it not be the state concerned which hatches a kind of conspiracy, a plot in order to assert its political and military supremacy?

The war of the 21st century is an ideological war. The conspiracy of one state against another lies in inventing a false accusation and repeating it quite often to in order to establish it as a common occurrence. Let us, in that context, examine the context of 11th September, 2001. According to a U.S. report, the incidents of 11th September, 2001 are classified among attacks of mysterious origin. Some aver that it is a conspiracy which has been given media coverage in order to give rise to a war. However, to make such an assertion, we need evidence as proof. Let us look at the clues and the evidence which, according to that report, indicate that 9-11 was a set-up.

Some unreported clues and facts following a private enquiry into 9-11 have been published on the website of a U.S. media organization. The evidence supporting their endeavors is in the form of images recorded during the 11th September attack. These images, supported by witness accounts, have shown that planes which struck the twin towers were not ordinary aircraft, but rather missile-bearing planes. A cautious study of the photographs and images from different angle has revealed that there was an ignition spark on the object attached to the plane well before it hit the building. An eye- witness has stated on Fox News that he saw an armour-plated plane, not an ordinary aircraft.

And then the sudden fall of the tower has puzzled many experts. An interview of the firemen who first entered the building after the attack has revealed bomb explosions inside the building. This means that the building had already been stuffed with explosions. The two planes which smashed into the middle level of the twin towers can damage the upper part, no doubt, but how do we explain the sudden fall of lower stories well below the impact level? The systematic and classic fall of the buildings of the towers can only take place with the help of heavy explosive material.

In addition, it is so obvious that the Pentagon has not been destroyed by one of the planes. No debris whatsoever of a plane have been found on the site. And how is it that the CNN, Fox and other U.S media have been able to convince the world that a Boeing could have caused a 16-foot impact damage to the building? Such an impact could only have been caused by a missile. On top of that, the fact that there were more damages of the impact rather than an outbreak of fire is evidence enough that it was more the impact of a missile than an airplane, because an airplane of Boeing type would have set the building on fire for days on end. The photograph taken by the security camera clearly shows that the explosion was not caused by the plane. All these details have been published in entitled publications: “Painful Questions_ An analysis of the September 11th attack”, “The 9-11 commission Report_ Omissions and Distortions”, “The Great Conspiracy”, “Crossing the Rubicon”, among others. Connect yourself on and click on Re Open911 Archived Site and you will be enlightened.

From all this, we infer than 9-11 was probably a gimmick. The U.S wanted something spectacular to attract public opinion, and thus lay the blame on the nearest suspected person. But, in the light of all these reported facts, we notice that the U.S. media and authorities have manipulated the data. You should know that a diversion, distortion or cover given to those individuals, group or organizations indicates their likely participation and their guilt in that incident. Let us now take another example of the event preceding the Iraqi war. President Bush had declared that Iraq had been found guilty pursuing its ambition of producing nuclear bombs and that intervention was therefore necessary. War was declared, Saddam Hussein was hanged and Iraq is today a country apart. International witnesses have given evidence to the effect that the charge of nuclear bomb preparation has proved to be a deliberate lie. I pay tribute here to our Colleague Mohammad Vayid for the talk he delivered on this subject and during which the U.S. Ambassadress made a walk-out.

Let us now examine the Mumbai attack. The advance of India after the nuclear tests was underlined. India’s supremacy over Pakistan economic matters and military powers is indisputable. However, India has not had the opportunity to assert herself over her neighbour. Now had come the opportunity. They were looking for such an opportunity, and why not a conspiracy, since all the leaders in responsible positions had resigned. And also because the elections were due in 2009. The BJP opposition took advantage of that event to focus its political meetings on those issues. In the final analysis, it was the politicians who, as usual, drew benefit from the whole issue. And those who lost their lives were unfortunate. Among the 195 victims, more than 40 Muslims, workers as well as clients, were killed.

A very particular and noteworthy clue is that the first person who was killed during the encounter was the head of the anti-terrorist Indian agency, Colonel Karkarcy. What is puzzling is that he had made use of the paraphernalia of the judiciary in the Malaygawn attack. During the attack, many Hindu religious men and diplomatic personnel were arrested. And, yet, the Press had made mention of the mujahidin. Karkarey’s wife had declined the offer of damages made by politicians whom she accused of the death of the husband and the massacre. The attack which took place at the Synagogue was done with the participation of the site manager. The security people had well observed that, as usual, two Muslim civilians had been escorted into the building by him.

One finds it hard to believe and understand how individualist groups from Pakistan could have reached there to cause all these damages. And if it was individualist groups who were involved, why blame the state of Pakistan?

The whole matter remains blurred. We are well advised to carefully consider the official report of the facts. The probability of a conspiracy attack cannot be ruled out.

(0 votes. Average 0 of 5)